Menu
Home
Post Something
Forums
Current Activity
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
Latest activity
News & Features
The Marketplace
Cars for Sale
Engine and Performance
Chassis and Wheels
Exterior and Body
Interior and Cockpit
ICE - In Car Entertainment
Car Shops and Services
Toys and Wares
All Other Stuff
Jobs and Vacancies
Looking For
Members
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Current Activity
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Reply to thread
See what others are reading now! Try Forums >
Current Activity
Home
Forums
Main Forums
General Talk
Nuclear power
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="FVel" data-source="post: 1063482160" data-attributes="member: 48425"><p>csl,</p><p></p><p>I’m not even going to bother replying your points. All your suggestions are based on fantasy. It has no technical basis. Just complete utter garbage. I don’t want to spend any more time than necessary engaging in discussions with no-clue nitwits with an over-developed sense of grandeur. </p><p></p><p>To think that some of us here actually had experience dealing with radiation issues on a regular basis and understood more than most people on the subject, it is nevertheless insulting that we are still being second-guessed by half-wits like you and accused of being narrow-minded with an attitude problem. </p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Personally, I think the one with the worst attitude here is you.</p><p></p><p>A few posts earlier, you are the one forcing the discussion towards technical issues when you questioned why we did not discuss SCRAM.</p><p></p><p>Obviously, after being made to look foolish by me for not understanding SCRAM and its association with the coolant systems, you now decide to change your tune and accuse us of being technical. </p><p></p><p>csl, you are a fraud. </p><p></p><p>You cannot even engage in discussions in a fair manner. When things are not going your way, you decide to move the goalposts and stack the deck in your favor.</p><p></p><p>Basically, you cannot accept when people disagree with you, irrespective of how considered their opinions may be. </p><p></p><p>For example, you had a meltdown a few posts earlier when Mizunori debated with facts against you. </p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Like I said, you are self-important and narcissistic. You have virtually no clue on the technical aspects but still that did not stop you from suggesting engineering solutions. </p><p></p><p>How does a guy who does not even understand how a reactor work actually have so much arrogance to suggest engineering solutions for nuclear reactors and, at the same time, accuse the collective community for being lazy, having a negative attitude and not doing all the research ?? </p><p></p><p>Oh, by the way, when you drew up your picture on how to build infrastructure for a reactor, that is ‘technical’ despite your earlier suggestion of ‘displeasure’ for anything of that sort……not that you notice when it suits you. When it does not suit you, you accuse me of being too technical. Gee…… You really are dumb</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>As usual ? LOL...As usual you write a lot of science fiction and people here are not getting educated in any substantive way by your ramblings. Please get a hold of yourself. You are not that smart, even if you think so. </p><p></p><p>By the way, what does 'csl' really stand for ? "<strong>C</strong>rap by the <strong>S</strong>hit <strong>L</strong>oads " ?<span style="color: Silver"></span></p><p><span style="color: Silver"></span></p><p><span style="color: Silver"><span style="font-size: 9px">---------- Post added at 12:03 PM ---------- 6 hour anti-bump limit - Previous post was at 11:42 AM ----------</span></span></p><p><span style="color: Silver"></span></p><p><span style="color: Silver"></span></p><p></p><p>Hi Richard,</p><p></p><p>There's a minimum size to what is feasible to power a national grid compared to powering a nuclear sub.</p><p></p><p>Two very different considerations and two very different power requirements. Submarine reactors are rated at hundreds of megawatts whereas power utility reactors are well over thousands of megawatts.</p><p></p><p>I cannot confirm Veloc's numbers on the costs of commissioning but it does not sound unreasonable. Reactors, and their infrastructure and support, even the smaller ones are very expensive. </p><p></p><p>There is also the question whether a total national population of only 28 million have a really dire need for nuclear power. </p><p></p><p>For one thing, it won't solve the oil dependency issue. </p><p></p><p>For another nuclear power has always been supplemental to more conventional means of power generation. It has not replaced conventional power even in nations that employ nuclear power.</p><p></p><p>Another point is, nations with nuclear power are, by and large, heavily industrialized with heavy population vis-a-vis the rest of the world. Their needs for power probably justify the path towards nukes to supplement the power equation. Malaysia is just 28 million heads and not particularly industrialized.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="FVel, post: 1063482160, member: 48425"] csl, I’m not even going to bother replying your points. All your suggestions are based on fantasy. It has no technical basis. Just complete utter garbage. I don’t want to spend any more time than necessary engaging in discussions with no-clue nitwits with an over-developed sense of grandeur. To think that some of us here actually had experience dealing with radiation issues on a regular basis and understood more than most people on the subject, it is nevertheless insulting that we are still being second-guessed by half-wits like you and accused of being narrow-minded with an attitude problem. Personally, I think the one with the worst attitude here is you. A few posts earlier, you are the one forcing the discussion towards technical issues when you questioned why we did not discuss SCRAM. Obviously, after being made to look foolish by me for not understanding SCRAM and its association with the coolant systems, you now decide to change your tune and accuse us of being technical. csl, you are a fraud. You cannot even engage in discussions in a fair manner. When things are not going your way, you decide to move the goalposts and stack the deck in your favor. Basically, you cannot accept when people disagree with you, irrespective of how considered their opinions may be. For example, you had a meltdown a few posts earlier when Mizunori debated with facts against you. Like I said, you are self-important and narcissistic. You have virtually no clue on the technical aspects but still that did not stop you from suggesting engineering solutions. How does a guy who does not even understand how a reactor work actually have so much arrogance to suggest engineering solutions for nuclear reactors and, at the same time, accuse the collective community for being lazy, having a negative attitude and not doing all the research ?? Oh, by the way, when you drew up your picture on how to build infrastructure for a reactor, that is ‘technical’ despite your earlier suggestion of ‘displeasure’ for anything of that sort……not that you notice when it suits you. When it does not suit you, you accuse me of being too technical. Gee…… You really are dumb As usual ? LOL...As usual you write a lot of science fiction and people here are not getting educated in any substantive way by your ramblings. Please get a hold of yourself. You are not that smart, even if you think so. By the way, what does 'csl' really stand for ? "[B]C[/B]rap by the [B]S[/B]hit [B]L[/B]oads " ?[COLOR="Silver"] [SIZE=1]---------- Post added at 12:03 PM ---------- 6 hour anti-bump limit - Previous post was at 11:42 AM ----------[/SIZE] [/COLOR] Hi Richard, There's a minimum size to what is feasible to power a national grid compared to powering a nuclear sub. Two very different considerations and two very different power requirements. Submarine reactors are rated at hundreds of megawatts whereas power utility reactors are well over thousands of megawatts. I cannot confirm Veloc's numbers on the costs of commissioning but it does not sound unreasonable. Reactors, and their infrastructure and support, even the smaller ones are very expensive. There is also the question whether a total national population of only 28 million have a really dire need for nuclear power. For one thing, it won't solve the oil dependency issue. For another nuclear power has always been supplemental to more conventional means of power generation. It has not replaced conventional power even in nations that employ nuclear power. Another point is, nations with nuclear power are, by and large, heavily industrialized with heavy population vis-a-vis the rest of the world. Their needs for power probably justify the path towards nukes to supplement the power equation. Malaysia is just 28 million heads and not particularly industrialized. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
The Marketplace Latest
Mugen MS-C Full Bucket Seat Civic Type R FL5 FK8
Started by
aycy
Engine and Performance
Boost Logic Boostlogic Oil Cooler Kit R35 GTR GTR35
Started by
aycy
Engine and Performance
Linney IHI 800WHP Turbo Kit R35 GTR35 GTR
Started by
aycy
Engine and Performance
Varis R35 GTR GTR35 Front Bumper
Started by
aycy
Exterior and Body
HKS Spec R Titanium Exhaust with Y pipe R35 GTR GTR35
Started by
aycy
Engine and Performance
2016 BMW 120i LCI M Sport F20 1.6 Auto
Started by
aycy
Cars for sale
GR Yaris H&R Front Rear Anti Roll Bar
Started by
aycy
Chassis and Wheels
BBS RI-A 10J God Spec FK8 FL5 Honda Civic Type R...
Started by
aycy
Chassis and Wheels
Rays Gram Lights 57CR GR Yaris Subaru Impreza Rim...
Started by
aycy
Chassis and Wheels
2019 Toyota FORTUNER 2.4 VRZ 4X4 (A) Diesel
Started by
aycy
Cars for sale
Posts refresh every 5 minutes
Chassis upgrades for CK Lancers, CJ Mirage
Hi guys, just wondering what you all get for chassis upgrades.
I want to get SuperPro bushes. but apart from that, I think rear undercarriage arms, knuckles, ARB etc from Evo 3 will fit, yes? How abt Front...
Zs from Brunei
Hello fellow Z owners, as a very close neighbouring countries, we are please to present out club in Brunei. Please visit our blog at
www.bzoca.blogspot.com
. Hope we can...
Can Teach Me How to DIY Wira Door (Speaker)
Hi... i'm kinda new here just wanna ask few question...
I'm driving a normal wira i just wonder izzit i can make a hole at my car front door to put a speaker in?
I need wat equipment to make a hole there?a saw...
Recent Posts
Looking for 2.5-16 cosworth halfcut for 190E
Started by
Tuanku.J
Euro
Thrills and Spills at Zhuhai: Porsche Carrera Cup Asia Rounds 3 & 4 Recap
Started by
The_Mechanic
News and Features
Proton Records High Demand for S70 with 1 Unit Booked every 4 minutes
Started by
The_Mechanic
News and Features
Toyota Malaysia Enters Regional GT Racing with TGR Racing Malaysia
Started by
The_Mechanic
News and Features
Home Win and Double Podium for Akash Nandy at Sepang Season Opener
Started by
The_Mechanic
News and Features
Search
Online now
Enjoying Zerotohundred?
Log-in
for an ad-less experience
Home
Forums
Main Forums
General Talk
Nuclear power